Showing posts with label state of the union address. Show all posts
Showing posts with label state of the union address. Show all posts

Tuesday, 24 January 2012

Obama’s State Of The Union Speech: Confrontation Wrapped In Kumbaya


Obama’s State Of The Union Speech: Confrontation Wrapped In Kumbaya .On first listen, the State President Obama's address to the Union had all the characteristics of the kind of bipartisan, let's-make-the-right-thing for the American tone that characterized his 2008 presidential campaign.

But, listen to more of a hard-edge, the tone is difficult, an overview of what the incumbent will probably look as he seeks a second term in November.

"We made too far to turn back now," Obama said at one point. "As long as I'm president, I will work with anyone in this room to keep the momentum going. But I have intended to fight against the obstruction to the action, and I will oppose any attempt to return to the same policy that brought on this economic crisis in the first place. "

Later, he offered an even more direct challenge: "With or without this Congress, I will continue to take steps to help grow the economy." He also urged Congress repeatedly "send me a project law ", adding that the bullet, legislative and political, was in their camp.

Even in his tone - a forceful and energetic delivery - said Mr. Obama had a simple message for Republicans: Game on.

The State of the Union speech was in keeping with the rhetoric coming out of this president and this White House dating back to the fight payroll tax cut extension late last year.

It seems as though the fight debt ceiling, which Obama described as a "fiasco" in his address tonight, convinced him once and for all that the only way to deal effectively with the Republicans was to show them that was ready to talk harder and push harder than they were.

He worked in the fight cut payroll taxes that Republicans folded after it became clear that their attempt to pass a long-term extension was convicted. (Obama made special mention of the tax on payroll in the State of the Union, "Let us be clear here, right now. No questions No drama side Pass the payroll tax cut without delay, "he said.)

Obama and the polls have increased in parallel with its desire to look down Republicans in Congress. His favorable rating in a Washington Post poll in the area last week had jumped 53 percent - including 51 percent with the independent electorally critical.

Given the success of its pivot rhetoric, it is not surprising that President Obama largely stuck to it during the State of the Union. While this was not the same speech he would give to a group of democracy activists and donors, it was also far from the addresses of the ideals that only come with a regularity of the election campaign in 2008.

This is version 2.0 of Obama: Harder, more cynical, but perhaps more effective. This is the Obama who will seek a second term this November - a ready to grant at least as good as it gets in a fight bare knuckles which is the American policy of Obama.

John Kerry Warns Sunbeam, DirecTV Against Super Bowl Blackout


John Kerry Warns Sunbeam, DirecTV Against Super Bowl Blackout.Senator John Kerry is hinting that WHDH-TV and DirecTV (Ch. 7) creates an enemy of him, if your dispute keeps 200,000 DirecTV customers in Greater Boston to see the Super Bowl.

"If people in Boston lost the Super Bowl this year because of this dispute, I can assure you will get people more and more to lower their arms and say, 'a curse on both their houses" Kerry wrote today in a letter to the heads of both companies.

Parents Sunbeam Television removed WHDH Channel 7 and WLVI [website]-TV (Ch. 56) of greater Boston DirecTV service on January 14 after his contract with DirecTV expired.

The two sides have failed to reach agreement on a new agreement in a dispute over the amount of "retransmission consent fees" of a renovation contract should include.

Retransmission rates are more or less payment of 50 cents per customer monthly cable providers and satellite TV stations to give the right to carry a particular channel.

However, disputes over these fees have become common in recent years as television stations, cable companies and satellite companies all fight for money in today's tough economy.

But because NBC is taking on 05 February, the Super Bowl is a subsidiary of NBC WHDH in Boston, no means no Super Bowl for WHDH Axis DirecTV customers if the dispute drags on.

The perspective of the New England Patriots [team stats] fans missing the big game has legislators up in arms.

Kerry, Sen. Scott Brown and 10 members of the State House DirecTV and Sunbeam have written in recent days asking them to resolve their fight before the big game.

Kerry increased further pressure today with a second letter to the heads of both companies.

Senator hinted that if the Hub DirecTV customers miss the Super Bowl, which will support proposals for new powers of the Federal Communications Commission to resolve conflicts of fees.

"I cannot force you to reach a solution, but it can and strongly urge you not to use the Super Bowl as a lever to the resolution," Kerry wrote.

"And I will continue working to urge the FCC to ensure that access to major live events (not) become a recurring tool to leverage in these negotiations," he said.

Kerry also called on both parties to publicly announce they are going to restore the signal to DirecTV for the Super Bowl WHDH least.

"I want every owner of a bar and family in our region with a subscription to DirecTV to know that it does not become collateral damage in (east) of disputes, (with) everything that Tom Brady [Statistics] and (Bill ) Belichick is on the line, "wrote the legislation.

DirecTV said it is willing to "immediately (restoration of Channel 7), while trading for (that) customers in the Boston area can enjoy the next Super Bowl."

Sunbeam did not immediately return calls seeking comment but has said he is suspicious of the restoration of its signal, while talks continue.

Sunbeam chief Ed Ansin told the Herald this week that DirecTV "has a reputation in the industry in many cases, to keep negotiations forever."

Obama Delivers A Confrontational State Of The Union Address


Obama Delivers A Confrontational State Of The Union Address.The Chairman opened a debate on the election-year role of government, drawing contrasts with Republicans on taxes for the rich and mortgage refinancing.

Using his State of the Union speech to draw contrasts with Republicans on these high-profile issues such as taxes and the housing market, President Obama has opened a debate on election years the role of government could be more intense than any in decades.

Warning Congress that "I intend to fight against the obstruction to action", he painted a picture of confrontation that contrasts sharply with the conciliatory approach adopted by the last Democrat to run for a second term, Bill Clinton.

In fact, the Obama strategy is more like that of George W. Bushin 2004, which used polarizing issues to increase the participation of his supporters and made some concessions to the center. The approach increases the likelihood that if he wins a second term, Obama could claim a mandate for his program. It also carries more risk of failure in a nation still deeply skeptical of government activism.

Only a few months ago, many voters seemed on the verge of writing off Obama. But in recent weeks, two developments have given him a chance to ask those voters for another look. One is the economy, which began to show signs of improvement - the decline in unemployment, consumer confidence and rising levels of household debt reduced. The other is how the Republican primary race has recently focused on the immense wealth (and the relatively low tax burden) of the game, sometimes front-runner, Mitt Romney.

Obama leads directly to the issue of wealth with the proposal of the signing of his speech: ". Fair share "of a minimum tax for millionaires who were part of his appeal to all Americans pay for their proposal, requiring that people with incomes over $ 1 million to pay at least 30% tax would be ideally - administration officials insist coincidence - double the tax that Romney made last year, according to the tax return of the former Massachusetts governor issued earlier in the day.

Similarly, the other's speech important domestic proposal - a plan to make more mortgage refinancing available to homeowners who owe more than the value of their homes "- would be to insert the government more directly in the housing market.

Republicans have flatly rejected a tax increase on those them term "job creators." And they called on the federal government out of the housing market entirely, saying that federal involvement is that the crisis foreclosure of the country worse.

They also lost time in rejecting Obama's premise of conflict of interests of the middle class and the wealthiest citizens of America. "We do not accept that ours will never be a nation of haves and have-nots, we must always be a nation of haves and soon-to-haves," Indiana, Mitch Daniels, the governor said in his Republican response. He accused Obama of "extremism" and called for lower tax rates.

Like Clinton, Obama seeks re-election after a defeat at mid-term change of scenery in which the Republicans took control of the House. The two Democrats delivered their election Year State of the Union speech after months of bruising clashes with Congress in which they tried - with some success - to paint Republicans as extremists.

But Clinton has sought to co-opt the rhetoric of the GOP, memorably declaring at the beginning of his speech that "the era of big government is over." And even if he used the power of his office to block the efforts of many Republicans to roll back government, it has largely set aside his own plans to expand its reach in areas like health care. By blurring the contrast between him and the Republican Party, Clinton has been a frustrating elusive target, but set up a campaign that avoided the most important problems.

The difference between the approach of Obama and Clinton reflects the personality of both men, but also time.

Clinton, for all the adulation he receives now from the left, came into national policy are trying to break the hold that the liberal interest groups had on his party and to criticize what he calls the "brain death policies of both parties.”Obama, for all his professed desire to create a" post-partisan "political culture, has a more liberal tradition in particular.

More importantly, the political center to which Clinton nailed so eroded in 16 years that Mr. Obama would probably not follow the model of Clinton, even if he wanted.

American political parties have grown more polarized. The Democrats have moved slightly to the left, Republicans have moved many steps to the right, according to political scientists who analyzed the votes of Congress, questions and data from voting machines. Political ideas that there are only a decade characterized the conservative side of the great debates - a mandate that individuals buy health insurance on a regulated market, for example, or a "cap and trade" to limit pollution - are now flayed by the Republicans.

During the past year, in which he tried and failed to reach a "grand bargain" with the Republicans on the federal budget, Obama has learned painfully how little land remains in the political center.

"Obama knows he has 44% of the electorate" to start, and in a country as divided as the United States, "44% is a lot," said Peter Hart, the Democratic pollster. He decided "I'll keep these people on board, then we'll go after everybody."

Get the rest of the way to persuade a majority depends on a handful of crucial voters in the middle who are pulled in two directions.

On the one hand, voters - including those who call themselves independent - have a vision deeply skeptical of the government and its ability to help them. Less than a third of voters have a positive view of the size and power of the federal government, a proportion that has fallen steadily since the early years of the Bush presidency, according to a series of Gallup polls.

At the same time, pollsters have found a significant and rapid increase in the percentage of people who doubt the republican idea that America has no class divisions. In 2009, a majority of Republicans and Independents said they saw little or no conflict between rich and poor, according to a survey by the Pew Research Center. Now, over two-thirds of Americans, including those of independent voters say they think such conflicts are "strong" or "very strong".

In the balance between skepticism of government and the recognition of class conflict, the 2012 elections could be determined.

Monday, 23 January 2012

State Of The Union: What Obama Must Do


State Of The Union: What Obama Must Do.WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama steps to the podium in the Capitol building on Tuesday night for his third State of the Union address, with the front center of the economy and the public's mind and popularity at its lowest.

With a national audience and a surprisingly volatile year for the Republican presidential primary, experts expect Obama to use the annual speech to boost his campaign to win another four years in office.

"The State of the Union address is a combination of political discourse and political discourse, because the two are bound together by our system," said Duke University political scientist David Rohde.

Obama saw some of the populist themes that will touch on Tuesday night - income inequality, including the role of government in the playing field for the middle class.

But the effectiveness of the annual address depends on several things, according to experts, including delivery, tone and resonance.

Here are five things that veteran political observers say Obama should do when he starts talking to 21 hours:


Stay above the fray

Obama should offer a contrast to the din of campaign ads in the last Republican presidential primary, policy experts said.

"All he has to do is to look presidential," said Hofstra University Presidential scholar Meena Bose, despite the attacks of the GOP would be challengers.

"What Obama as president wants to do is rise above charges," said Bose. "The president wants to be on the offensive, not defensive."


The stress of the economic gains

The economy may have helped Obama three years ago, but it has now become a sore point - a target for enemies Republicans, a source of pessimism for Americans, according to polls, and a question that the president might want to avoid .

But Rohde said: "It has taken over the dead."

The spokesman for the White House Jay Carney says the economy will be the focus of speech.

Lynn Vavreck, a political scientist at UCLA, said Obama should focus on the growth of 3 percent of GDP in the fourth quarter of 2011 and the fall of one-half percent unemployment rate, from 9 percent to 8 5 percent in recent months.

"The winning message is not on the level of unemployment," said Vavreck. "This is the trend line."

Obama needs to follow this line, Rohde said: "It's getting better, it's getting better faster than before recently, and it is expected he will continue to s' improve it.”


Engage Congress

Obama has made no secret of the fact that he intended to run against Congress this year.

It is planned to include a sharper edge in the face legislators, particularly the GOP House. But it must also show that wants to work with Congress to create jobs.

"The president must call upon them to bear the burden of leadership and policy development," Bose said.


Show that it is at work

Polls show Americans are tired of Washington because he cannot do something. Obama must show that it is, nevertheless, to work hard.

"The overriding message of this address will be the skill and get things done," said Bose.

"You really see the advantages of incumbency," she said, as he talks about steps he will take, without the Congress.


Drive Home themes

Obama said he will present an economic model, offering new initiatives on manufacturing jobs, energy and training. But it will also revisit the measures Congress has stalled.

"President Obama really needs to show he is in control of the situation, he has a clear plan and it is up to Congress to react," said Bose.

After the speech, Obama head out of an official five-state tour for three days to push his agenda.

Vavreck said the speech to clarify his belief that the economy is recovering ". Now that things are better, do not change horses midstream”

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More