Archdiocese of Philadelphia by the closing and merging schools, many see it, why is the one who can stop and wonder.
With the creation of charter schools across the city, and expressed the hope that the declining enrollment, tuition rose is always a factor. Blue Ribbon Commission has introduced an element of the Catholic Church by refusing to help. All my life I am a Catholic church and its wide range of world the charity is allowed to see.
Catholic Church, like the federal government, the country is considered as a supplier of money in the world. The church and the government refused to declassify their efforts to save money.
Good week to pay for my church, where parishioners donate money for the effort or does not say is that I never have to. Most of that money is always sent to the parish. Archdiocese has closed or is very close to school, but always in the Montgomery County build a new school, Pope John Paul II. He built a new school with high tuition fees, public service is Montgomery County. Why?
Money for new construction should be, and improving existing high schools could be encouraged.
Finally, the church, such as government, to support their needs. They take care of you, and put the burden on our shoulders to the world.
James Crown
Cardinal Dougherty (now closed), '88
Philadelphia
Catholic High School by'm the announcement of closure was not really surprised. Molesting priests that parents enroll their children in Catholic schools are afraid, afraid that their child by a priest who abused their position is likely to be molested. God is angry against them, awaiting their punishment in hell.
Robert F. Schaffer
Philadelphia
It's me, or anyone else Archdiocese "blue ribbon commission" to make it angry?
It is bad enough that the 2:1 ratio of men (11 men, five women) was more than ... After all, a woman of 54 years, Catholic hierarchy of the church have used this type of discrimination.
Which makes me a while ballistic ... A member of the Committee of 16 members was a lay woman! Represented only 6% commission on our voice is needed? His misogyny is disgusting!
Not that the four nuns or 11 men on the input of the board, but the fact that the Archdiocese collect call this "blue ribbon" of the Commission, and agrees that only one of 16 members representing the experience leaves can lay its population of women is an insult.
Proof of misogyny and its expensive! Catholic women, not just to set another blatant act of discrimination, but it's a bad business decision when considering the future of Catholic education!
Catholic Archdiocese lay not only women represent a large proportion of the population, we also have a large percentage of decision makers when it comes to Catholic education users.
Archdioceses of us who are mothers have a majority of customers. However, we were told the Commission to provide acceptable voice only 6 percent thought.
This raises the question what is considered a unique approach that leads to the woman lay Catholics (the perspective of members of the faith and the community and customers) that is assigned to?
0 comments:
Post a Comment